Eseuri
Citing Wikipedia is unprofesional!
1 min lectură·
Mediu
From http://planetmath.org/?op=getmsg&id=14357 I got a text by Mario Cerano from Mexico
I don\'t read wikipedia since it is full of junk
[http://english.agonia.net/index.php/personals/197056/in
dex.html] and very biased.
It is under youngsters\' control and has a bad reputation
in the academic world:
[http://english.agonia.net/index.php/essay/197055/index.
html]. Many youngsters don\'t have enough background.
Concerning Wikipedia, it is really a junk, and
every time I get involved in improving some article, I
have to \"fight\" with incompetence of the wiki-editors,
which in most cases do not understand what they edit,
but just search in the internet to find some lie, and
then insert it directly without checking the facts.
Somebody was falsely accused in wikipedia of having
killed Kennedy! I heard that in USA news on TV.
Wikipedia slanders people, includes undocumented stuff,
includes lies and insults people.
Mario Cerano (Mexico)
004.567
0
Despre aceasta lucrare
- Autor
- gicu dorian
- Tip
- Eseuri
- Cuvinte
- 135
- Citire
- 1 min
- Actualizat
Cum sa citezi
gicu dorian. “Citing Wikipedia is unprofesional!.” Atelier, Poezie.ro, https://poezie.ro/atelier/gicu-dorian/eseu/239835/citing-wikipedia-is-unprofesionalComentarii (0)
Autentifica-te pentru a lasa un comentariu.
